The Next Secretary of Education in the U.S.?
During the past week, I spent two days serving as part of a national “Expert Panel” discussing how we could do a better job of helping beginning teachers (and all educators) incorporate developmentally appropriate practices into our work. Let’s face it – there are things that we do in schools even though we know they aren’t the best educational practice. For example, we have high school students begin their day around 7:30 AM even though research has shown they will do better academically by starting a couple of hours later.
It was a real privilege to represent the teaching profession amongst this group of cognitive psychologists and professors of education from prestigious universities across the country. Maybe the most impressive individual was one of the co-chairs, Professor Linda Darling-Hammond from Stanford University. She truly understands the realities of teaching in today’s public schools. She also understands what needs to be fixed with NCLB. She even understands that paying teachers based on their student’s test scores is a very bad strategy.
Dr. Darling-Hammond left a bit early on the second day. In addition to her many other duties, she is the chief policy analyst on education issues for Senator Barack Obama. She left to participate in a debate with the chief policy analyst for Senator John McCain, former Superintendent of Public Instruction from Arizona, Lisa Graham Keegan.
There could be no clearer contrast for me – Dr Darling-Hammond collaborates with NEA and has a positive agenda for improving schools in the U.S. Ms. Keegan sees vouchers, private schools, and pay for test scores as the best course for public education. I sincerely hope that Dr. Darling-Hammond is the next Secretary of Education in the U.S. because the alternative could mean that the Department of Education goes from bad to worse (yes, worse than calling teachers terrorists!)

